> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://committees.docs.intersectmbo.org/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://committees.docs.intersectmbo.org/intersect-civics-committee/meeting-minutes/2026-civics-meeting-minutes/civics-committee-minutes-12th-march-2026.md).

# Civics Committee Minutes 12th March 2026

## Attendees

| Name              | Attendance | Role      | Voting Seat (Y/N) | Election Term |
| ----------------- | ---------- | --------- | ----------------- | ------------- |
| Nicolas Cerny,    | Yes        | Chair     | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Larisa Mcfarlane  | Yes        | Secretary | N                 | N/A           |
| Thomas Lindseth   | Yes        | Intersect | N                 | N/A           |
| Ken-Erik O        | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Nana Safo         | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Alex Seregin      | No         | Member    | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Randy             | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Dzubang Mermoz    | No         | Member    | Y                 | April 2026    |
| Ian Hartwell      | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | October 2026  |
| Megan Dyamond     | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | October 2026  |
| Musa Ridwan Itopa | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | October 2026  |
| Simon Fleck       | Yes        | Member    | Y                 | October 2026  |

## Sources

Transcript: [CIVICS Committee (Intersect) Meeting - 2026\_03\_19 12\_50 GMT - Notes by Gemini.docx](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UTKkkz_oRHUuEH3PW_KE5ol_aSLgfx9NptY6jX1eY1E/edit?tab=t.tcu1po44me3c)

Recording: [recording](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1816SVFWb1da3yJ9OzYsgk5Et4DPV0cDo/view)

## Agenda

* Meeting Opening and Agenda Review
* Civics Committee Budget Discussion
* Constitutional Committee Parameter Changes
* Working Group Updates
* Upcoming Town Hall and Committee Elections

## Decisions/Actions

The Civics Committee finalized 2026 budget priorities and discussed parameters for Constitutional Committee (CC) size and quorum. The committee approved a 2026 budget proposal focused on governance workshops and recurring CC election costs with 6 yes votes. The DREP incentives research proposal was determined to be a necessary standalone initiative. T.L. proposed changing the minimum CC size to 6 and altering the quorum threshold from 2/3 to 7/10 to address DREP centralization concerns, maintaining an effective 5-vote requirement for quorum while allowing for one CC member retirement. The CAP working group is near finalizing the scope of the CAP editor role, and a new Governance Participation working group was formally agreed upon, contingent on a charter.

### Decisions Made

Civics Budget Focus Approved: The committee approved a 2026 budget proposal focused on governance workshops and recurring Constitutional Committee election costs with 6 yes votes.

Governance Participation Working Group Established: The committee formally agreed to establish a new Governance Participation working group, contingent upon the development of a charter.

### Action Items

LM: Schedule dedicated budget proposal meeting next week.&#x20;

TL: Finalize CAP Editor Role scope document; conduct vote next week.&#x20;

NC: Review S.R.'s DRep incentives research document; provide detailed feedback.

NC: Lobby DREPs to secure funding for governance related proposals.

LM: Assist committee members needing help logging into the virtual hub for Town Hall attendance.

LM, SF: Set up the Governance Participation working group charter and first meeting details; prepare charter for approval next week.&#x20;

The group: Develop main civics committee budget proposal using the new template focusing on governance workshops and recurring costs.

NC: Place slide text about committee size reduction and threshold change into chat.

The group: Start assembling the Civics Committee budget document.

The group: Maintain focus and effort within assigned working groups; review S.R.'s working group output.

LM: Add 1 additional hour immediately following next Thursday meeting.&#x20;

The group: Register and attend the virtual hub town square event Tuesday.&#x20;

## Topic Notes

<table data-header-hidden><thead><tr><th></th><th width="360"></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Topic</td><td>Discussion</td><td>Notes</td></tr><tr><td>1. Meeting Opening and Agenda Review</td><td>N.C. welcomed participants, noting budget season. L.M. confirmed a packed agenda. Main topic: committee budget.</td><td>Budget season initiated. Efficiency required due to packed agenda.</td></tr><tr><td>2. Civics Committee Budget Discussion</td><td>Finalizing budget for on-chain process. Five initiatives identified: global ada holder education, civics research fellowship, CC election costs, constitutional amendment workshops, DRep incentives research. Goal: decide initiatives for unified budget.</td><td>Budget for on-chain process. Five key initiatives reviewed.</td></tr><tr><td>3. Budget Cap and Proposal Concerns</td><td>K.O. confirmed 1M ada budget cap due to DRep reluctance. L.M. noted large budgets risk shifting responsibility to Intersect. K.O. warned a single unpopular item could 'nuke' the proposal.</td><td>1M ada cap. Large budgets are a risk. Unpopular items can jeopardize proposals.</td></tr><tr><td>4. DRep Incentives Proposal</td><td>S.R. clarified DRep incentives research is a standalone proposal, not for civics budget, to avoid conflict of interest. K.O. supported and offered assistance.</td><td>Standalone proposal to avoid conflict. K.O. offered support.</td></tr><tr><td>5. Decision on Civics Committee Budget</td><td>Committee polled to approve budget focused on governance workshops and recurring costs. Passed with 6 yes, 1 no. L.M. to schedule dedicated meeting for specifics.</td><td>Budget approved (6:1) for workshops/recurring costs. L.M. to schedule follow-up.</td></tr><tr><td>6. Upcoming Town Hall and Elections</td><td>L.M. announced Town Hall on March 17th for committee elections. Members asked to attend to promote work. Formal applications due March 31st.</td><td>Town Hall March 17th for elections. Applications due March 31st.</td></tr><tr><td>7. Working Group Updates</td><td>T.L. reported CAP WG near finalizing editor role scope. R.R. updated on governance education WG compiling resources for a health dashboard.</td><td>CAP editor scope near final. Governance education WG compiling resources.</td></tr><tr><td>8. Formalizing Governance Participation WG</td><td>S.R. requested official vote for new Governance Participation WG. L.M. confirmed charter needed, suggesting using existing frameworks. Charter approval next week.</td><td>New WG requires official vote and charter. Charter approval next week.</td></tr><tr><td>9. Constitutional Committee Size Parameter Change</td><td>N.C. opened discussion on CC min size. T.L. proposed changing min size to 6 and quorum to 7/10 to allow one member retirement while maintaining effective 5-vote quorum.</td><td>Proposal: CC min size 6, quorum 7/10. Maintains 5-vote quorum.</td></tr><tr><td>10. Quorum Threshold Clarification</td><td>N.C. sought rounding clarification. T.L. confirmed 7/10 (70%) is higher than 2/3 (66%), but effective 5 votes for quorum remains with 7 members. Current plan is CC size 7, quorum change with update CC action.</td><td>Rounding confirmed. 7/10 is higher threshold, but 5 votes remain effective. CC size 7, quorum change via update action.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<br>


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://committees.docs.intersectmbo.org/intersect-civics-committee/meeting-minutes/2026-civics-meeting-minutes/civics-committee-minutes-12th-march-2026.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
