| First name | Last name | Position | Voting Member |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan | Kelly | TSC Member | Y |
| Alexander | Moser | TSC Member (Cardano Foundation) | Y |
| Markus | Gufler | TSC Member (Cardano Foundation) | Y |
| Kevin | Hammond | TSC Chair | Y |
| Benjamin | Hart | TSC Member (MLabs) | Y |
| Kevin | Hammond | TSC Chair | Y |
| Sebastian | Nagel | TSC Member (IOG) | Y |
| Nicolas | Biri | TSC Member (IOG) | Y |
| Duncan | Soutar | TSC Secretary | N |
| Terence | McCutcheon | OSC Secretary | |
| Christian | Taylor | Intersect - Opensource Head | N |
| Kris | Bennett | Observer | N |
| Lorenzo | Bruno | Observer | N |
| Agenda Item | Discussion | Actions / Decisions |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Apologies | Ben Hart, Neil Davies, Duncan Coutts | |
| 2. Update from ISC | DS: Target to complete TSC Remit is 30th June for Board Meeting ISC Committee Member to join Board meeting 30th June Off-chain contracts being created within Procurement atIntersect 39 treasury withdrawals preferred in DRep Poll | |
| 3. Follow Up on KES Agent | Duncan C & Adam not present therefore not discussed | |
| 4. Intra-era hard fork to fix non-disjoint reference inputs | KH: Relevant to discussion on TSC Remit regarding Hard Forks Desire to fix a particular bug within Release team however, this is impacts an exceptionally low level of Ada (approx 500 Ada) Therefore recommends not to rush next hard fork in order to address this issue Recommends trying to have one single Hard for event which includes Plutus Improvements Potentially looking at convening HF working group in September Node Development Team would like a decision by TSC on Hard Fork Timing: When would it happen? How should it be managed - reconvene HFWG? KH: Implication that next Hardfork would need to be at least 3 months after this one so would be looking at potentially a year away | Action: Duncan to send a vote out in Slack on whether to have single HF event or two |
| 5.TSC Remit | DS:Walked though the RACI Matrix template Gave an example of a completed area in relation to TSC's responsibilities. Clarified that this is being used to help clarify position with Intersect Board. | Action: TSC members to input their views into the document for next TSC session |
| 6. Any further discussion on the maintenance contract and how IOG proposes to progress it Is IOG taking on full responsibility for all core maintenance? If not, how should it be covered? | KH: Important that SoWs provided cover all of the work a)proposed by IOG b) needed as part of core maintenance MG: Expressed frustration that TSC members are hearing about Hard Fork plans as part of a public meeting. How can the TSC be informed ahead of the call? KH: [Check Recording] At this stage it is information on how it wants to be involved, what actions it wants to take, content of Hard Fork. Will look at how information from the Node Development Team is shared with the TSC to keep it up to date. | |
| 7. Proposed Joint meeting with OSC and possibly PSC to classify “core” budget proposals | KH: Seeking to arrange a meeting with the OSC to agree scope of Budget proposals and which ones can be considered core | Action: Duncan to speak to Christian and Tex on availability |