11th June 25

Meeting Recording:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcTFj1AUU_c

Attendees:

First name	Last name	Position	Voting Member
Jonathan	Kelly	TSC Member	Y
Alexander	Moser	TSC Member (Cardano Foundation)	Y
Markus	Gufler	TSC Member (Cardano Foundation)	Y
Kevin	Hammond	TSC Chair	Y
Benjamin	Hart	TSC Member (MLabs)	Y
Kevin	Hammond	TSC Chair	Y
Sebastian	Nagel	TSC Member (IOG)	Y
Nicolas	Biri	TSC Member (IOG)	Y
Duncan	Soutar	TSC Secretary	N
Terence	McCutcheon	OSC Secretary
Christian	Taylor	Intersect - Opensource Head	N
Kris	Bennett	Observer	N
Lorenzo	Bruno	Observer	N

Minutes:

Agenda Item	Discussion	Actions / Decisions
1. Apologies	Ben Hart, Neil Davies, Duncan Coutts
2. Update from ISC	DS: Target to complete TSC Remit is 30th June for Board Meeting ISC Committee Member to join Board meeting 30th June Off-chain contracts being created within Procurement atIntersect 39 treasury withdrawals preferred in DRep Poll
3. Follow Up on KES Agent	Duncan C & Adam not present therefore not discussed
4. Intra-era hard fork to fix non-disjoint reference inputs	KH: Relevant to discussion on TSC Remit regarding Hard Forks Desire to fix a particular bug within Release team however, this is impacts an exceptionally low level of Ada (approx 500 Ada) Therefore recommends not to rush next hard fork in order to address this issue Recommends trying to have one single Hard for event which includes Plutus Improvements Potentially looking at convening HF working group in September Node Development Team would like a decision by TSC on Hard Fork Timing: When would it happen? How should it be managed - reconvene HFWG? KH: Implication that next Hardfork would need to be at least 3 months after this one so would be looking at potentially a year away	Action: Duncan to send a vote out in Slack on whether to have single HF event or two
5.TSC Remit	DS:Walked though the RACI Matrix template Gave an example of a completed area in relation to TSC's responsibilities. Clarified that this is being used to help clarify position with Intersect Board.	Action: TSC members to input their views into the document for next TSC session
6. Any further discussion on the maintenance contract and how IOG proposes to progress it Is IOG taking on full responsibility for all core maintenance? If not, how should it be covered?	KH: Important that SoWs provided cover all of the work a)proposed by IOG b) needed as part of core maintenance MG: Expressed frustration that TSC members are hearing about Hard Fork plans as part of a public meeting. How can the TSC be informed ahead of the call? KH: [Check Recording] At this stage it is information on how it wants to be involved, what actions it wants to take, content of Hard Fork. Will look at how information from the Node Development Team is shared with the TSC to keep it up to date.
7. Proposed Joint meeting with OSC and possibly PSC to classify “core” budget proposals	KH: Seeking to arrange a meeting with the OSC to agree scope of Budget proposals and which ones can be considered core	Action: Duncan to speak to Christian and Tex on availability