(25/6/24) Meeting Minutes

June 25, 2024

Attendees:

  • Ben Hart

  • Giorgio Zinetti

  • Alex Karpov

  • Sam Leathers

  • Eystein Hansen

  • Silona Bonewald

  • Duncan Soutar

  • Douglas Ferguson

  • Hwang HuongKet

Agenda

Action items

Discussion PointsNotes/Action ItemsActions: Responsible/None

Introduction & Quorum

Quorum achieved

Approve the Agenda

Agenda approved

None

Minutes, Online Votes, & Publishing Updates

Minutes approved

New Member Nomination

Nori was nominated by Leonard as MCC rep for cross-communication.

Lloyd Duhon is nominated as Civics rep and advisor on Budget/Process.

Group discussed whether committee reps within working groups have similar voting rights, as they also represent the community.

Group to reach out to both Nori and Lloyd to see if they’re able to take on these obligations within the CIR-WG, or if they want to nominate someone else from their respective groups.

Hwang to reach out to Nori and Lloyd.

Eystein to reach out to a candidate with a technical background.

Review Task HeatMap

The group reviewed the artifact heatmap. Hwang to buddy with Silona on arranging the Talking Points session with the 9 item champions.

The Talking Points session is the precursor to the Open Call with the wider community.

Leonard and Ben will be revising the milestones date. Eystein proposes 2 new roles: CIP and Business Case Liaison.

Hwang to arrange talking points with 9 items champion for Silona

Proposed Changes to Process Flow - responding to TSC feedback

Based on last week’s session with TSC, a revision to the roadmap process was put forward to reflect the changes The group reviewed the changes and provided further inputs for consideration.

The group will be reaching out to TWG/SIG leads to discuss on how the process can be shaped

Defining Steps in Process Flow (Schematic)

The group will be working on individual components of the process.

The prioritization rubric is a key component that should be defined. Silona and Sam will look to define the first draft of the rubric.

Silona and Sam to define the prioritization rubric.

Key Priorities (The 9 Items)

The 9 existing items have been listed on the Key Priorities spreadsheet and will serve as a template for a triage run. Sam and Giorgio will look into the various items and provide a recommendation for readiness in the next workshop

Sam and Giorgio to review and provide recommendations for triage runs.

2 business day notice for approvals which require review

Motion to approve for the context of a decision requires more than 1 page document review, 2 business days are required except under emergency circumstances - motions which do not meet this requirement will go to an asynchronous online vote. 0 opposed. Motion carries

Review Action Items & Owners

Hwang and Douglas to update Artifacts Heatmap and share on Discord

Last updated