(1/7/24) Meeting Minutes
July 1, 2024
Attendees:
Santiago Carmuega
Sebastian Bode
Michael Fellinger
Giorgio Zinetti
Alex Karpov
Sam Leathers
Eystein Hansen
Silona Bonewald
Leonard Hegarty
Douglas Ferguson
Hwang HuongKet
Agenda
Action items
Discussion Points | Notes/Action Items | Actions: Responsible/None |
---|---|---|
Introduction & Quorum | Quorum achieved |
|
Approval on Agenda, Minutes, Online Votes, & Publishing Updates | Agenda and Minutes approved |
|
Owners for dev report & discord channels | Motion approved to have dev report & discord announcement channels approved together with minutes during start of every workshop. |
|
Review Task HeatMap | The group discussed the various artifacts that are currently in development:
Group reviewed the potential of anonymous contributors to the roadmap. Group also agreed on the importance of prioritizing supporting the community to get items onto the list.
| 1) Hwang to look into schedule with the Suppliers 2) Silona & Sam & Leonard to work on last review on the Current State 3) Hwang/Leonard/ Sam review ZkP Contract before publication. Alex to review the List of 9. 4) Hwang to consult Tim H & Tim R on the standard for publication 5) Leonard/Sam/ Silona to start with creating draft for CIP/CPS |
New Member Nomination | The CIR-WG understands the need to engage with different groups. Nori, Lloyd Duhon and Trymyrt are approved as new members within the working group. The members were nominated due to their roles in the other committees. Nori - MCC representative Lloyd - Civics Committee representative Trymyrt - Technical SME | Hwang to send out invitations on behalf of CIR-WG |
Discussion: Transparency | The group reviewed the importance of maintaining transparency of work done within the community. Motion approved to publish work done through DevReports and Discord posts once approved. |
|
WG vs Committee | The group had an alignment on the definition of WG, TWG and Committee with Committee Liaison Karen Wickham. The CIR-WG is a working group by nature and will have a definite end point, where the working group will be dissolved once its objectives are met. Potentially, a CIR-Sub Committee may be formed. The CIR-WG’s remit would be to design the framework and processes necessary to develop that Sub-Committee. The working group is targeting 90-days to finish the objectives it set out to achieve . No motion was put forward |
|
List of 9 items Process Flow review | The working group put through the Roadmap items “List of 9” the process phases in terms of Drafting/Refining/Approving/Delivering.
| Hwang to invite Marshall, Christian & Ryan as guest to review relevant items |
Last updated